This joint presentation by the Cornell Law Library and the Legal Information Institute will examine contemporary challenges to accessing legal information faced by both legal professionals and the general public. Topics will include barriers to access arising from the privatization of government functions leading to a primary law-for-profit structure, the challenges inherent in court filing systems doubling as information retrieval platforms, and the obfuscation of legal information when accessed through commercial search engines such as Google. More than just identifying problems, though, the presentation will describe the work being done at Cornell and elsewhere to overcome these barriers to free and open access to legal information.
- Introductory Overview
- Statement of topics to be covered and anticipated take-aways
- Access to Justice in the Age of AI Requires Complete Sets of Primary Laws
- Access to the best legal tools is the most expensive it has ever been
- The current situation of un-and under-represented litigants in the U.S.
- The current types of free legal authorities
- Needed free tools to make free access useful
- Why genAI in the current system of free legal authorities is concerning
- Legal Information & Artificial Intelligence
- Why this topic is relevant to lawyers
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org and public access to law online
- Lawyers and free online legal resources
- ABA surveys
- 2025 Clio Legal Trends Report
- General use AI platforms as legal research tools
- Chat GPT
- Google Gemini & AI Overviews
- AI-mediated online legal research
- Concept explained
- Reliance on secondary sources
- Examples
- Q&A (As Time Permits)
Cornell University
Anna Russell is the Deputy Director for the Cornell University Law Library. Prior to her appointment at Cornell, she was a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals library branch manager, based in Anchorage, Alaska. Anna began her law library career in a warmer climate, though, at the University of San Diego’s Pardee Legal Research Center. Read More ›
The Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (In-Person), Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (In-Person), Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.20 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Difficulty: All Levels
Status: Pending
Format: On-Demand
Credits: TBD
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (In-Person), Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
This presentation is approved for one hour of General CLE credit in Alabama, one hour of General CLE credit in Alaska, one hour of General CLE credit in California, one hour of General CLE credit in Hawaii, one hour of General CLE credit in Nebraska, one hour of General CLE credit in North Carolina, one hour of General CLE credit in Ohio, one hour of Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure CLE credit in Pennsylvania, one hour of General CLE credit in South Carolina (all levels), one hour of General CLE credit in Utah, and one hour of General CLE credit in Vermont. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. An application for accreditation of this activity has been submitted to the MCLE Committee of the State Bar of Texas and is pending.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.