This session provides a rapid, practice-focused review of the key litigation shaping U.S. immigration law under the current administration. We will examine major court decisions that affect citizenship, enforcement, removals, asylum, students, employment-based immigration, and humanitarian programs. The goal is to give practitioners a clear understanding of where the law is shifting, what remains uncertain, and how to advise clients operating in an unstable legal environment.
- Citizenship Litigation
- Overview of the litigation surrounding birthright citizenship, including Trump v. Casa and Executive Order 14160. We will discuss how courts have responded, the status of universal injunctions, and what the Supreme Court’s actions mean for future challenges.
- Immigration Enforcement Cases
- Review of Trump v. J.G.G. and the Supreme Court’s approach to Alien Enemies Act litigation. Focus on how enforcement strategy is intersecting with constitutional constraints and emergency relief procedures.
- Removals and Due Process
- Discussion of D.V.D. v. DHS and related cases addressing notice, CAT claims, and judicial oversight of expedited removal pathways. Includes a brief look at bond-related litigation such as Maldonado.
- Asylum Litigation
- Analysis of RAICES v. Noem and the courts’ treatment of INA §212(f) proclamations attempting to restrict or halt asylum processing. We will cover how courts evaluate “invasion” rationales and the limits of presidential authority.
- Student Visa Litigation & SEVIS Terminations
- Examination of Harvard v. DHS and the wave of SEVIS terminations affecting thousands of international students. We will outline the current status of litigation across 65+ cases, court-ordered remedies, and forthcoming visa-revocation challenges.
- H-1B Litigation
- Discussion of Global Nurse Force v. Trump and Chamber of Commerce v. Trump, the challenges to the $100,000 “pay-to-enter” H-1B proclamation, and how courts are assessing executive authority over employment-based visa programs.
- R-1 Religious Worker Litigation
- Review of Roman Catholic Diocese of Paterson v. DOS and the litigation surrounding the five-year R-1 limit. Brief update on the dismissal based on the government’s proposed rule.
- TPS Litigation
- Survey of cases challenging TPS terminations for countries including Syria, Venezuela, and Haiti. Discussion of the Supreme Court’s shadow-docket role and resulting uncertainty for beneficiaries and practitioners.
- DACA Litigation
- Overview of Texas v. United States, the Fifth Circuit remand, and the implications of bifurcated nationwide operation of DACA — one set of rules for Texas, another for the rest of the country.
- Q&A (As Time Permits)
This webinar is divided into section summaries, which you can scan for key points and then dive into the sections that interest you the most.
Please note this AI-generated summary provides a general overview of the webinar but may not capture all details, nuances, or the exact words of the speaker. For complete accuracy, please refer to the original webinar recording.
Kuck Baxter LLC
Charles H. (“Chuck”) Kuck is the Founding Partner of Kuck Baxter LLC in Atlanta, Georgia. Chuck served as the National President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association from 2008-2009. He also served as President of the Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers from 2010-2014 and has been an Adjunct Professor of Law for more than 20 years, currently at Emory Law School. He was named one of the top 5 immigration attorneys in the world by Chambers & Partners again in 2022, the “Best Lawyer-Immigration” in Georgia by Best Lawyers in 2022, and was previously named one of the “100 Most Influential Georgians” by Georgia Trend magazine. Read More ›
Siskind Susser, PC
Greg Siskind is a founding partner of Siskind Susser and has been practicing immigration law since 1990. He is also a co-founder of AI software company Visalaw Ventures. He received his bachelor’s degree from Vanderbilt University and his law degree from the University of Chicago. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
Earn Credit Until: January 6, 2027
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Earn Credit Until: February 28, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure
Earn Credit Until: January 6, 2028
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2029
This presentation is approved for one hour of General CLE credit in California, one hour of General CLE credit in North Carolina, one hour of Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure CLE credit in Pennsylvania, and one hour of General CLE credit in West Virginia. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.00 credit hours.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.