As the legal landscape evolves, understanding both the recurring and emerging risks and challenges that our clients face is crucial. In this program, we will discuss some of the data compiled in the recent ABA Profile of Legal Malpractice Claims and similar reports, examining not only the micro — facts and figures, where administrative and substantive errors are being made, and especially problematic areas of practice, but also the macro — an exploration of key developments, including AI and technology, the economy, emerging regulatory concerns including a discussion of the relevant Model Rules of Professional Conduct, cybersecurity, the “transactional” nature of modern practice, and tort inflation. We will also provide some insight on how to minimize exposure to these professional liability claims and stay ahead of the trends.
Learning Objectives:
- Identify and Analyze Common Legal Malpractice Risks: Participants will be able to interpret data from the ABA Profile of Legal Malpractice Claims and similar reports to recognize recurring administrative and substantive errors, as well as high-risk practice areas
- Evaluate Emerging Trends and Challenges in Legal Practice: Participants will assess the impact of evolving factors such as AI and technology, economic shifts, tort inflation, and the transactional nature of modern legal work on professional liability exposure
- Understand Ethical Considerations: Participants will apply relevant Model Rules of Professional Conduct to LPL trends and understand the interrelation between them
- Develop Strategies to Minimize Professional Liability Exposure: Participants will formulate proactive approaches to reduce the risk of malpractice claims and adapt to evolving legal practice trends through improved risk management and compliance practices
- Introduction & Disclaimers
- Welcome and speaker introduction
- Purpose of the presentation
- Legal guidance vs. legal advice disclaimer
- Overview & Roadmap
- Key topics to be covered:
- Emerging data and trends
- MRPC insights
- LPL claims analysis
- Risk mitigation strategies
- Emerging Data & Trends in Legal Malpractice
- Understanding MRPC & Core Competencies
- MRPC 1.1 – Competence
- MRPC 1.3 – Diligence
- MRPC 1.2 & 1.4 – Scope of Representation & Communication
- Trends in LPL Claims
- Risk in Estate, Trust & Probate claims
- Decline in PI and Family Law claims
- “Settle & Sue” phenomenon
- Frequency vs. severity of claims
- Catastrophic claims and unworthy clients
- Rule 1.2(d) and aiding client fraud
- Risk Management & Client Due Diligence
- New MRPC 1.16(a) – Termination & Withdrawal
- Risk-based inquiry and client vetting
- Red flags and warning signs
- Consequences of poor due diligence
- Modern Challenges & Risk Mitigation
- Technology risks: AI, texting, email errors
- Cybersecurity threats
- Transactional client relationships
- Risk management strategies:
- Engagement letters
- Conflict checks
- Documentation and checklists
- Questions & Answers (as time permits)
This webinar is divided into section summaries, which you can scan for key points and then dive into the sections that interest you the most.
Please note this AI-generated summary provides a general overview of the webinar but may not capture all details, nuances, or the exact words of the speaker. For complete accuracy, please refer to the original webinar recording.
CNA's Lawyers Insurance Program
Tracy L. Kepler is the Director of Risk Control for CNA’s Lawyers’ Insurance Program. In this role, she leads the lawyers’ professional liability team, is accountable for business results through delivery of risk control services and designs and develops content and distribution of risk control initiatives relevant to the practice of law. Tracy reviews and directs the evaluation and assessment of loss exposures and the application of risk control policies, guidelines, regulations, and drives the resolution of risk control issues and problems. She also collaborates with the underwriting and claims teams to develop and execute strategies for the profitable growth of the program. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics
Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 Ethics/Professionalism
Earn Credit Until: September 9, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: February 28, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Attorney Professional Conduct
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: July 31, 2026
This presentation is approved for one hour of Legal Ethics CLE credit in California, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in North Carolina, and one hour of Attorney Professional Conduct CLE credit in Ohio. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 1.20 qualify as total hours of credit for Ethics/Professionalism. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.00 credit hours, of which 1.00 credit hours will apply to Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility credit.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.