Running a law practice is much different than lawyering and includes the entire law firm enterprise. Whether you are a solo practitioner operating your practice with minimal support staff, or an attorney practicing in an international mega law firm, compliance with Rules 1.6(c), 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 and 8.4(a) of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct is prevalent in both settings as are the legal malpractice and attorney disciplinary exposures. In this program, we will consider our obligations under the Model Rules and also take a look at these exposures from a broad perspective, focusing on junior associates, interns/externs, law firm support staff, outside vendors and the emerging enigma of artificial intelligence.
Learning Objectives:
- Identify the range of internal and external contributors to law firm operations & understand how various roles, from attorneys to vendors, impact legal service delivery and malpractice exposure.
- Recognize common malpractice risks associated with inadequate supervision and vendor management & learn how failures in oversight, training, and contract review can lead to ethical violations and liability.
- Apply ABA Model Rules and ethics opinions to real-world scenarios involving support staff and technology & explore how legal professionals must supervise nonlawyers and responsibly integrate technology like AI into practice.
- Implement risk control strategies to mitigate exposure and enhance operational efficiency & develop actionable steps for training, communication, and vendor oversight to reduce malpractice risks.
- Introduction
- Welcome, objectives, and framing the issue
- Quote: “No attorney is an island” & explanation
- Importance of collaboration and risk awareness
- Mapping the Legal Universe
- Cast of characters in a law firm
- Internal vs. external contributors
- Identifying potential exposures
- Risks: incompetence, data access, confidentiality
- Supervisory Responsibilities & Ethics
- ABA Model Rule 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 8.4(a) and 1.6(c)
- Lawyer responsibilities for nonlawyer conduct
- Consequences of poor supervision
- Case example: NJ attorney suspension
- Risk Control Recommendations
- Training, vetting, and contract review
- Encouraging communication
- Role of support staff in risk avoidance
- Ethics Opinions & Support Staff Oversight
- ABA and state-specific ethics opinions
- Support staff as gatekeepers
- Managing workload and client complaints
- Internal Malpractice Case Studies
- JPMorgan $1.5B error
- Paralegal forging court orders
- Lessons learned and accountability
- Culture & Communication
- Creating a supportive environment
- Educating attorneys and staff
- Risk control resources
- Vendor Management & Ethics
- Outsourcing risks and ethics opinions
- Vendor failures (e.g., process server case)
- Recommendations: consent, monitoring, confidentiality
- Technology & AI in Legal Practice
- Ethics opinions on tech use
- ABA Model Rule 1.1 and tech competence
- AI & ChatGPT: risks, supervision, client consent
- AI case examples and headlines
- Resources & Closing
- Resources
- Final thoughts and Q&A
This webinar is divided into section summaries, which you can scan for key points and then dive into the sections that interest you the most.
Please note this AI-generated summary provides a general overview of the webinar but may not capture all details, nuances, or the exact words of the speaker. For complete accuracy, please refer to the original webinar recording.
CNA's Lawyers Insurance Program
Tracy L. Kepler is the Director of Risk Control for CNA’s Lawyers’ Insurance Program. In this role, she leads the lawyers’ professional liability team, is accountable for business results through delivery of risk control services and designs and develops content and distribution of risk control initiatives relevant to the practice of law. Tracy reviews and directs the evaluation and assessment of loss exposures and the application of risk control policies, guidelines, regulations, and drives the resolution of risk control issues and problems. She also collaborates with the underwriting and claims teams to develop and execute strategies for the profitable growth of the program. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics
Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 Ethics/Professionalism
Earn Credit Until: October 23, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: February 28, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics and Professionalism
Earn Credit: February 1, 2026 – February 1, 2027
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics, Professionalism, or Substance Abuse
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2027
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: November 30, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: December 4, 2030
This presentation is approved for one hour of Legal Ethics CLE credit in California, one hour of Professional Responsibility CLE credit in Illinois, one hour of Legal Ethics CLE credit in Louisiana, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in North Carolina, one hour of Ethics, Professionalism, or Substance Abuse CLE credit in Pennsylvania, and one hour of Ethics and Professional Responsibility CLE credit in Washington. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 1.20 qualify as total hours of credit for Ethics/Professionalism. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.00 credit hours, of which 1.00 credit hours will apply to Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility credit.
This presentation is approved for one hour of Legal Ethics and Professionalism CLE credit in Oklahoma from 2026-02-01 to 2027-02-01.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.