Are you a trial lawyer, seeking to increase your chances on appeal? It’s important to think ahead about key issues while you’re still in the trial court. Appellate attorney Johanna Schiavoni will discuss procedural traps she frequently sees litigators and trial lawyers fall into, how those mistakes can end up fatally undermining otherwise meritorious appeals, and practice tips to avoid making appeal-killing mistakes.
- Introductory Overview
- The importance of preparing and preserving a case for appeal while in the trial court
- Pitfalls in Preserving the Record
- Frequent record-preservation issues
- Pre-Trial Errors
- Certain issues/orders that must be challenged by interlocutory appeal or writ petition
- Strategic considerations regarding interlocutory or writ review
- Mistakes with pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment/adjudication or in limine motions
- Trial Errors
- Objections at trial
- Exhibits/offers of proof
- Verdict forms
- Jury instructions and objections
- Bench Trials, Differences, and Peculiarities
- Mistakes With Post-Trial Motions
- Preserving the right to raise certain motions
- Timing and scope of post-trial motions
- Closing Thoughts
- The importance of a timely notice of appeal – comparative deadlines
- Ways that working with an appellate lawyer can enhance a trial lawyer’s case and preparation at any stage
- Questions & Answers (As Time Permits)
Free Justia Connect Memberships are available to lawyers, other legal professionals, students, and all law enthusiasts.
Log In NowNot a Member? Get Connected for Free
* CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pro members.
Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP
Johanna Schiavoni is a certified specialist in appellate law, admitted in California, New York, and federal appellate courts around the country. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
This presentation is approved for one hour of General CLE credit in Alaska, one hour of General CLE credit in California, one hour of General CLE credit in Hawaii, one hour of General CLE credit in Illinois, one hour of General CLE credit in Missouri, one hour of General CLE credit in Nevada, one hour of General CLE credit in North Carolina, one hour of General CLE credit in Ohio, one hour of Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure CLE credit in Pennsylvania, one hour of General CLE credit in Vermont, and one hour of General CLE credit in West Virginia. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.00 credit hours.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.