Over 100 lawsuits have been filed alleging copyright infringement due to training AI models on copyrighted content. These lawsuits are dominating the headlines. However, many other important AI legal issues are being litigated, but are not garnering the same attention. This webinar will look beyond the copyright training lawsuits and cover 10 other important AI legal issues that are being litigated.
- Overview of AI Litigation
- A high level overview of the AI litigation landscape
- Circumvention of Technical Measures
- The growing number of AI lawsuits under the CFAA and DMCA
- Trade Secret/Prompt Injection
- AI trade secret cases, including ones from classic fact patterns (e.g., employee misappropriation, corporate espionage) and AI-unique issues such as prompt injection and AI model distillation
- AI Agents
- An army of agents are autonomously transacting on websites, and the site operators are not ready for this
- Pending litigation and potential future issues with AI agents
- AI Voice Recorders
- How AI notetakers and recorders put a new spin on wiretapping and intrusion on seclusion claims, and the resulting lawsuits
- Biometric Privacy/Voiceprints
- Lawsuits involving biometric privacy, including misuse of voice prints, facial recognition, and other biometric data
- Deep Fakes/NIL
- AI can easily recreate users’ voices, appearance, and other identifiers, leading to various lawsuits
- DMCA/Removal of Copyright Management Information (CMI)
- Several cases involve removal of CMI and one has reached the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
- How courts address these issues and where there are circuit splits
- Defamation
- What happens when AI outputs false information about a person?
- Issues with AI-based defamation claims
- False Advertising
- Some companies have been sued for falsely advertising AI capabilities or benefits
- Negligence/Product Liability
- Many users have experienced physical and mental harms based on use of AI
- Pending cases where AI companies are accused of negligence or product liability based on these harms
- Q&A (As Time Permits)
Sheppard Mullin
Jim Gatto is a partner in Sheppard Mullin’s Washington D.C. office, where he founded and co-leads the firm's 120+ person Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Quantum Team. With a robust technical background and over 35 years of experience, Jim provides strategic, business-focused advice on all aspects of intellectual property, technology transactions, regulatory issues, and litigation, particularly those driven by innovative business models and disruptive technologies. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.20 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Difficulty: All Levels
Status: Pending
Format: On-Demand
Credits: TBD
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 General
This presentation is approved for one hour of General CLE credit in Alabama, one hour of General CLE credit in Alaska, one hour of General CLE credit in California, one hour of General CLE credit in Hawaii, one hour of General CLE credit in Nebraska, one hour of General CLE credit in North Carolina, one hour of General CLE credit in Ohio, one hour of Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure CLE credit in Pennsylvania, one hour of General CLE credit in South Carolina (all levels), one hour of General CLE credit in Utah, and one hour of General CLE credit in Vermont. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. An application for accreditation of this activity has been submitted to the MCLE Committee of the State Bar of Texas and is pending.
This presentation is approved for one hour of General CLE credit in California from 2026-07-01 to 2028-06-30, Illinois from 2026-07-01 to 2028-06-30, and Louisiana from 2026-07-01 to 2026-12-31.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.