This presentation, co-led by Alicia Pollard Esq., AIGP, CIPP/US and Avi Aiken Fernandez, J.D., will explore the critical legal and ethical challenges posed by the rapid integration of Generative AI into legal practice. Drawing on Ms. Fernandezʼs expertise in the anticipatory governance of AI and her background in criminal prosecution and constitutional law, alongside Ms. Pollard's specialized focus on data privacy and information governance, the discussion will bridge legal theory with real-world implementation.
The session will focus on the 'Crossroads of Personality & Practice,' examining how individual leadership and a commitment to justice (the 'Personality') must guide the adoption of technology within legal institutions (the 'Practice'). Attendees will gain actionable insights on maintaining institutional trust, navigating AI-related ethical ambiguities, and proactively addressing the policy challenges of this evolving technological landscape, ensuring ethical leadership in the future of law.
- Overview
- Changing workplace dynamics in the legal field and workplace challenges requiring leadership awareness and involvement
- Poll asking the audience about familiarity with personality profiles MBTI and DiSC
- How the usage of Generative AI is informed by leadership and personality profiles
- Personality Profiles
- Discussion of the personality profiles that can inform leadership styles:
- Framework I: The DiSC Model
- Framework II: Myers-Briggs
- Review of Interactive Generative AI Use Cases
- Workplace Scenario / Use Case 1 - The Board
- Workplace Scenario / Use Case 2 - The Generational Gap
- Workplace Scenario / Use Case 3 - The Miscommunication
- Ethical Use of Generative AI
- Review of cases that relate to the ethical usage of AI in leadership, including:
- Mata v. Avianca, Inc., No. 1:2022cv01461, (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
- Park v. Kim, No. 22-2057 (2d Cir. 2024)
- Hanson, Jr. et al v. Nest Home Lending, LLC et al, No.25-cv-02599-GPG-KAS (D. Colo. 2025)
- Key Takeaways
- ABA Rules of Professional Conduct [Model Rule 1.1, 1.6, and 3.3]
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11
- Local/State Rules that are similar to the ABA and Federal rules covered
- (See handout for authorities and additional case examples)
- Q&A (As time permits)
This webinar is divided into section summaries, which you can scan for key points and then dive into the sections that interest you the most.
Please note this AI-generated summary provides a general overview of the webinar but may not capture all details, nuances, or the exact words of the speaker. For complete accuracy, please refer to the original webinar recording.
Alicia Pollard has served as a legal and strategic advisor in many different fields: from corporate matters in Big Law; transitioning to business and legal affairs in media & entertainment; and later centering her practice around technology, with a particular emphasis on data protection and AI risk management. Alicia has worked with a diverse range of companies and tech enterprises to ensure digital responsibility and security in all areas of commercial transactions. She is certified through the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) in Information Privacy and AI Governance. Read More ›
Avi Aiken Fernandez is an accomplished attorney, legal scholar, and political scientist who explores the convergence of emerging technology, law, and leadership. Her current research focuses on the critical issues of anticipatory governance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and how judicial institutions can be strengthened to better serve the public interest and maintain trust in a rapidly evolving technological landscape. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: February 4, 2031
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Technology in the Practice of Law
Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: February 4, 2028
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: February 4, 2028
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: February 5, 2028
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics and Professional Conduct
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2029
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 Ethics/Professionalism
Earn Credit Until: February 4, 2027
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Attorney Professional Conduct
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Ethics, Professionalism, or Substance Abuse
Earn Credit Until: February 4, 2028
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Difficulty: All Levels
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Pending
Credits: TBD
Earn Credit Until: TBD
This presentation is approved for one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Alabama, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Alaska, one hour of Technology in the Practice of Law CLE credit in California, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Hawaii, one hour of Professional Responsibility CLE credit in Illinois, one hour of Professional Responsibility CLE credit in Nebraska, one hour of Ethics and Professional Conduct CLE credit in Nevada, one hour of Attorney Professional Conduct CLE credit in Ohio, one hour of Ethics, Professionalism, or Substance Abuse CLE credit in Pennsylvania, and one hour of Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility CLE credit in South Carolina (all levels). This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 1.20 qualify as total hours of credit for Ethics/Professionalism. An application for accreditation of this activity has been submitted to the MCLE Committee of the State Bar of Texas and is pending.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.