Artificial intelligence has moved from experiment to infrastructure in legal practice. In this timely presentation, two leading voices in legal innovation — Bridget McCormack, CEO of the American Arbitration Association and former Chief Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court and Jennifer Leonard, Founder of Creative Lawyers — provide practitioners with a comprehensive framework for navigating AI’s transformation of the legal profession.
The program begins with the ethical foundation every lawyer needs: ABA Formal Opinion 512 and state bar guidance on competence, confidentiality, supervision, and billing when using generative AI tools. Attendees will learn how the conversation around AI is changing from a focus on risk alone to a focus on the possibilities AI creates for improved service and client outcomes.
The presenters will examine the current state of AI technology, including recent benchmarking data showing AI tools now matching or exceeding lawyer performance on legal research tasks. They will explore the widening adoption gap between corporate legal departments and law firms, the market pressures driving unprecedented merger activity, and the emergence of private equity investment in legal services attributed in part to AI.
Rather than viewing AI as a threat, this program reframes the conversation around the irreplaceable human advantage: emotional intelligence, professional judgment, client counseling, and the relationship-building that defines excellent lawyering. Attendees will learn practical governance frameworks for responsible AI adoption, including a five-step process for defining use cases, identifying risks, and implementing appropriate guardrails.
The session concludes with a case study of the American Arbitration Association’s groundbreaking AI Arbitrator, demonstrating how “informed, not automated” approaches can enhance access to justice while maintaining human oversight.
- Introduction & Framing
- Overview of AI’s evolution from “nice to have” (2024) to “table stakes” (2026–27)
- Framing the central question: How do lawyers remain indispensable while embracing AI as a force multiplier?
- Ethical Duties & Professional Responsibility
- Overview of ABA Formal Opinion 512
- Discussion of changing ethical obligations from AI avoidance to responsible AI usage for maximizing client outcomes
- State of AI Technology
- Overview of current AI landscape: GPT-5.2, Claude 4.5, Gemini 3, and legal-specific platforms (Harvey, CoCounsel)
- VLAIR benchmarking study findings
- Law Firm Disruption & Market Pressures
- The adoption gap between law firms and corporate legal departments
- Law firm merger acceleration driven by technology investment needs
- Private equity entering legal services: Arizona ABS entities, KPMG Law US, MSO structures
- The competitive imperative to invest or consolidate
- The Human Advantage & Lawyer Development
- What AI cannot replicate: emotional intelligence, reading the room, counseling clients through crisis, professional judgment built through experience
- Larry Richard’s research on lawyer personality traits and implications for AI adoption
- New formation imperatives: technical fluency, AI interaction skills, quality control, strategic thinking, client communication
- Training challenges: How do junior lawyers develop skills when AI handles first-draft work?
- Simulation-based training, AI coaches, mentorship evolution
- AI Governance & Case Study
- Five-step governance framework: (1) define use case, (2) pinpoint risks, (3) decide on guardrails, (4) implement guardrails, (5) monitor and adjust
- Case study: AAA’s AI Arbitrator demonstrates responsible AI implementation that enhances access to justice while maintaining professional standards
- Key Takeaways
- Summary of essential mindsets for the AI era: courage, humility, empathy, investment, entrepreneurship, collaboration
- Action items for attendees: review firm AI policies, assess personal AI competence, identify one use case to pilot responsibly
Free Justia Connect Memberships are available to lawyers, other legal professionals, students, and all law enthusiasts.
Log In NowNot a Member? Get Connected for Free
* CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pro members.
American Arbitration Association
Bridget M. McCormack is President and CEO of the American Arbitration Association-International Centre for Dispute Resolution (AAA-ICDR), the leading global provider of alternative dispute resolution services. She assumed the role in 2023, bringing deep experience as a jurist, educator, and advocate for innovation in legal services. Read More ›
Creative Lawyers
Jen Leonard is the Founder of Creative Lawyers, a company that works with leaders in legal to drive creative solutions that respond to an era of significant change. She and her team design educational programming for lawyers on various topics related to innovation, including generative AI literacy offerings for law firms and corporate legal teams. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Technology in the Practice of Law
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Technology Training
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Difficulty: All Levels
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.00 General
Status: Approved
Credits: 1.20 General
This presentation is approved for one hour of General CLE credit in Alabama, one hour of General CLE credit in Alaska, one hour of Technology in the Practice of Law CLE credit in California, one hour of General CLE credit in Hawaii, one hour of General CLE credit in Illinois, one hour of General CLE credit in Louisiana, one hour of General CLE credit in Maine, one hour of General CLE credit in Missouri, one hour of General CLE credit in Nebraska, one hour of General CLE credit in Nevada, one hour of Technology Training CLE credit in North Carolina, one hour of General CLE credit in Ohio, one hour of Substantive Law, Practice, and Procedure CLE credit in Pennsylvania, one hour of General CLE credit in Rhode Island, one hour of General CLE credit in South Carolina (all levels), one hour of General CLE credit in Utah, one hour of General CLE credit in Vermont, and one hour of General CLE credit in West Virginia. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.00 credit hours.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.