The speakers will discuss the affirmative obligation that all lawyers have to communicate with their clients, and suggest certain practices to ensure that they are not accused of violating RPC 1.4 in a bar complaint.
- Introductory Overview and Why Communication Matters
- Overview of the ethical importance of attorney-client communication
- Common causes of disciplinary complaints related to communication failures
- The connection between communication, client trust, and professional responsibility
- The Basics: Understanding Rule 1.4 and Related Duties
- Overview of ABA Model Rule 1.4 and its relationship to Rules 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, and 1.6
- Duties to inform, consult with, and explain matters to clients
- What constitutes “reasonable” communication under the Rules
- Informed consent and client decision-making responsibilities
- Applying the Rules: Common Communication Pitfalls
- Communicating developments that materially affect a client’s matter
- Changes in claims, litigation strategy, and case status updates
- Settlement offers and the lawyer’s obligation to communicate and obtain client direction
- Communication responsibilities when clients are unavailable or difficult to reach
- Multiple-client representations and communication with each client
- Attorney transitions, staffing changes, and withdrawal from representation
- Communication Challenges in Modern Practice
- Managing unreasonable or repetitive client requests for information
- Cultural and language competence in client communication
- Ethical considerations when using interpreters and third parties
- Artificial intelligence, client disclosure obligations, and ABA Formal Opinion 512
- Avoiding misunderstandings and ensuring informed client decisions
- Practical Tips and Risk Management Strategies
- Calibrating communication frequency based on the stage of representation
- Best practices for documenting client communications
- Creating defensible records of advice, updates, and client instructions
- Placeholder communications, voicemail logs, and written follow-up practices
- Professionalism, Key Takeaways, and Conclusion
- The role of civility and professionalism in client communication
- Lessons learned from disciplinary matters and malpractice claims
- Practical steps attorneys can implement immediately to reduce communication-related risk
- Q&A (As Time Permits)
This webinar is divided into section summaries, which you can scan for key points and then dive into the sections that interest you the most.
Please note this AI-generated summary provides a general overview of the webinar but may not capture all details, nuances, or the exact words of the speaker. For complete accuracy, please refer to the original webinar recording.
Buchalter
Amber Bevacqua-Lynott is Of Counsel in the Firm’s Portland, San Diego and Seattle offices. She is the Co-Chair of the Firm’s Professional Responsibility Group and a member of the Litigation Practice Group. Read More ›
Reuter Corbett, LLP
Troy Wood is an attorney with extensive experience in legal ethics, professional responsibility, and regulatory management within the legal profession, currently serving as Of Counsel at Reuter Corbett, LLP, where he manages the firm's Professional Responsibility and Legal Ethics Practice. His career highlights include managing jurisdiction relations for the National Conference of Bar Examiners, significantly contributing to the adoption of the Next Gen Uniform Bar Exam, and a long tenured as a regulatory administrator at the Oregon State Bar, where he served as Regulatory Counsel, overseeing admissions, MCLE, and other regulatory requirements that lawyers must comply with in order to maintain their licenses. Read More ›
*CLE credit is only available to Justia Connect Pros. Not a Pro? Upgrade today>>
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: July 15, 2031
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics
Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2028
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: July 15, 2028
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Professional Responsibility - Ethics / Civility / Professionalism / Sexual Harassment Prevention
Earn Credit Until: July 15, 2028
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: July 16, 2028
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.20 Ethics/Professionalism
Earn Credit Until: July 15, 2027
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: February 28, 2027
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Attorney Professional Conduct
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Ethics, Professionalism, or Substance Abuse
Earn Credit Until: July 15, 2028
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Difficulty: All Levels
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility
Earn Credit Until: June 30, 2027
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2026
Status: Approved
Format: Live (Virtual), On-Demand
Credits: 1.00 Ethics
Earn Credit Until: July 16, 2031
Status: Approved
Format: On-Demand
Credits: 1.20 Legal Ethics, etc.
Earn Credit Until: December 31, 2029
This presentation is approved for one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Alabama, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Alaska, one hour of Legal Ethics CLE credit in California, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Hawaii, one hour of Professional Responsibility - Ethics / Civility / Professionalism / Sexual Harassment Prevention CLE credit in Illinois, one hour of Legal Ethics CLE credit in Louisiana, one hour of Professional Responsibility CLE credit in Nebraska, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in North Carolina, one hour of Attorney Professional Conduct CLE credit in Ohio, one hour of Ethics, Professionalism, or Substance Abuse CLE credit in Pennsylvania, one hour of Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility CLE credit in South Carolina (all levels), one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Utah, one hour of Ethics CLE credit in Vermont, and one hour of Legal Ethics, etc. CLE credit in West Virginia. This program has been approved by the Board on Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 1.20 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 1.20 qualify as total hours of credit for Ethics/Professionalism. This course has been approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education credit by the State Bar of Texas Committee on MCLE in the amount of 1.00 credit hours, of which 1.00 credit hours will apply to Legal Ethics/Professional Responsibility credit.
Justia only reports attendance in jurisdictions in which a particular Justia CLE Webinar is officially accredited. Lawyers may need to self-submit their certificates for CLE credit in jurisdictions not listed above.
Note that CLE credit, including partial credit, cannot be earned outside of the relevant accreditation period. To earn credit for a course, a lawyer must watch the entire course within the relevant accreditation period. Lawyers who have viewed a presentation multiple times may not be able to claim credit in their jurisdiction more than once. Justia reserves the right, at its discretion, to grant an attendee partial or no credit, in accordance with viewing duration and other methods of verifying course completion.
At this time, Justia only offers CLE courses officially accredited in certain states. Lawyers may generate a generic attendance certificate to self-submit credit in their own jurisdiction, but Justia does not guarantee that lawyers will receive their desired CLE credit through the self-submission or reciprocity process.